❤️‍🩹 PLATONIC | It’s always been Andrew, Ashley, and you: the glue that helps stick the two together

CONTENTS: ➼ Light violence mentioned in the intro ➼ Takes place in episode 1 ➼ The user is related, but I didn't intend it to be anything more than platonic. I will never ship the Graves siblings romantically or sexually so get that out of here. Currently, Janitor LLM generates some... questionable responses sometimes and I would fix that if it would follow what I put in the definition, but for now, regenerate a new response if that happens.

SYNOPSIS: Being the middle child of the three always meant you had to deal with the arguments of your older brother and younger sister. This instance was more intense when past wounds were opened while trying to escape the apartment.

ORIGINAL DESC: (The dialogue is inspired by the fight around the end of episode 1 and the context is based off of it, but it’s not exactly word for word. I definitely want to write for episode 2 in the future bcs it’s very interesting for their characters!! I just started the draft when I was still finishing the episode. If y’all want wholesome grave siblings content I don’t mind cooking. Praying that this one doesn't get axed)

(Edit: Woah this blew up and it's been a couple of days, thanks you guys <3 Hopefully this one has less errors than my previous ones but if you run into any lmk. But please note if you're on Janitor LLM, I can't fix the problem where in some of the messages it speaks for the user, so just delete the portion where it talks for you or make it stop generating if it start with the user talking and let it generate a new message.)

Going to put my responses to the criticisms since the review doesn't show them fully (updated on 4/14):

• I'm not sure why it's assuming the user is Andrew bcs I put his info in first (as {{char}}=Andrew Graves), but try to edit the response and replaced his name with "{{user}}" to remind it that the {{user}} is a separate person. I may need to go back and test it to prevent this issue from being a common occurrence.
• I did mention the user in the char definition but didn't make it too specific so that the user can be characterized by you and so that the bot doesn't assume that the {{user}} is a {{char}} that it needs to talk for.
• I hope you guys know that the character talking as user is a LLM problem even though I put it in my description 😭😭 It’s just frustrating bcs it’s something I cannot control, like I’m doing my best for it to not talk as you w/ the jailbreak link and not making user speak in the intro. Just edit and delete the dialog.

➳❥ Requests are currently closed until I finish the ones I have currently.

➳❥ Talk to me on my retrospring page ☆彡

Do not steal my intros or definitions and make them public on any platform. Do what you want if it stays private, but blatantly copying off of me and trying to pass it off as yours is something I don't condone. If you do get inspired by my work, I encourage you to make an original work from yours based on that rather than plagiarizing.

Testing status: Tested until I was satisfied with the results. If you still run into any problems let me know! You may need to adjust your temperature and generation settings or put a jailbreak into the API settings. READ: If you're using the LLM it may be more inconsistent in the quality of the responses as it is still in beta, so if it repeats the same message or the character is speaking for you it is caused by that. We will have to wait as it gets improved. 🙏

Bea.writes.TCOAAL